This presentation deals with an article by Subha Chakraborty Dasgupta- Comparative Literature in India: an Overview of its History. It consists key- points from the article. It was presented as a classroom group task in Department of English, MKBU.

1. COMPARATIVE LITERATURE IN INDIA:
An Overview of its History
Subha Chakraborty Dasgupta, Jadavpur University
Department of English,
Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
Presented by: Jheel Barad
Roll No.: 12
Dhruvita Dhameliya
Roll No.: 03
Sem 4 (batch 2021-23)

2. ABSTRACT
The essay gives an overview of the trajectory of Comparative Literature in India,
focusing primarily on the department at Jadavpur University, where it began, and to some
extent the department of Modern Indian Languages and Literary Studies in the University of
Delhi, where it later had a new beginning in its engagement with Indian literatures. The
department at Jadavpur began with the legacy of Rabindranath Tagore’s speech on World
Literature and with a modern poet-translator as its founder. While British legacies in the
study of literature were evident in the early years, there were also subtle efforts towards a
decolonizing process and an overall attempt to enhance and nurture creativity. Gradually
Indian literature began to receive prominence along with literatures from the Southern part
of the globe. Paradigms of approaches in comparative literary studies also shifted from
influence and analogy studies to cross-cultural literary relations, to the focus on reception
and transformation. In the last few years Comparative Literature has taken on new
perspectives, engaging with different areas of culture and knowledge, particularly those
related to marginalized spaces, along with the focus on recovering new areas of non-
hierarchical literary relations.

3. CONTENTS
● The Beginnings
● Indian Literature as Comparative Literature
● Centres of Comparative Literature Studies
● Reconfiguration of areas of comparison
● Research directions
● Interface with Translation Studies and Cultural Studies
● Non-hierarchical connectivity

4. THE BEGINNINGS
Long before the establishment of Comparative Literature as a discipline, there were texts focusing on
comparative aspects of literature in India, both from the point of view of its relation with literatures from other
parts of the world and from the perspective of inter-Indian literary studies.
Satyendranath Dutta in 1904 “relationships of Joy”- establishing relations with literature of world (Translation
Activities).
Rabindranath Tagore talk on ‘Vishwa Sahitya’ at National Council of Education in 1907.
Pretext for the establishment of the department of Comparative Literature at Jadavpur University in 1956.
Different from the British system of Education prevalent at that time, attempt to decolonize education system.
Idea of World literature- in Bengal- beginning of translation activities.
Vishwa Sahitya- sense of a community of artists as workers- The notion of literature again was deeply embedded
on human relationships, and hence the aesthetic sense was linked with the sense of the human.
Buddhadeva Bose- Did not agree to the idealist view of Tagore- but quoted writing about the discipline,
interpreting it more in the context of establishing connections, of ‘knowing’ literatures of the world

5. Translations of Baudelaire, Hoelderlin and Kalidasa- mark of beginnings of a decolonising process
Sudhindranath Dutta- translation of Mallarmé and his erudition both in the Indian and the Western context
Naresh Guha, took charge of Bose (Chairperson of Department).
Colonial framework was also evident.
It is impossible to speak of the epistemology of comparison with reference to a diverse group of individuals.
Early stages- recognizing new aesthetic systems, new visions of the sublime and new ethical imperatives – the Greek
drama and the Indian nataka
Then- a question of linking social and historical structures with aesthetics in order to reveal the dialectic between them
Core of a section of the syllabus- Comparisons between the Iliad and the Ramayana, between Sanskrit and Greek drama
taking both Aristotle’s Poetics and Bharata’s Natyasastra
The project did not “bring into existence a new object/subject of knowledge” (Radhakrishnan ‘Why Compare?’)
Jadavpur Journal of Comparative Literature (1961)- an important journal in literary studies in the country.

6. Indian Literature as Comparative Literature
Indian literature entered the syllabus, not from the point of view of asserting national identity but studying a
text within a network of relations.
Delhi University- 1962, Modern Indian Languages department
1974- the department of Modern Indian Languages started a post-MA course entitled “Comparative Indian
Literature”
A national seminar on Comparative Literature was held in Delhi University organized by Nagendra, volume
entitled Comparative Literature was published in 1977.
In 1994, an MA course in ‘Comparative Indian Literature’ began in the department.
As stated earlier the juxtaposition of different canons had led to the questioning of universalist canons right
from the beginning of comparative studies in India and now with the focus shifting to Indian literature, and
in some instances to literatures from the Southern part of the globe, one moved further away from
subscribing to a priori questions related to canon-formation.

7. Shift from Sanskrit centric to conceptual study- Older definitions of Indian literature often with only
Sanskrit at the centre. Abandoned oral and performative traditions, and did not do justice to the overlap
between social formations, histories and languages, and to the multilingualism that formed the very core of
Indian literature.
voiced by Aijaz Ahmad, to trace “the dialectic of unity and difference – through systematic periodization of
multiple linguistic overlaps, and by grounding that dialectic in the history of material productions, ideological
struggles, competing conceptions of class and community and gender, elite offensives and popular resistances,
overlaps of cultural vocabularies and performative genres, and histories of orality and writing and print”
Dealing with Indian literature- had to look at the interplay between the mainstream and the popular, the
elite and the marginalised and also to some extent foreground intermedial perspectives as different forms
existed together in a composite manner, particularly in earlier periods in which textual and performative
traditions existed simultaneously.
Also meant looking at the interactions taking place with literatures in regions beyond the geopolitical
boundaries of the nation state.
Sisir Kumar Das- Indian literatures were studied not as discrete units but in dialogue with one another

8. Teaching material on various aspects of Indian literature from a comparative perspective, beginning from
language origins,
manuscript cultures,
performative traditions
along with painting, sculpture and architecture, the history of print culture and
questions related to modernity
Interdisciplinary
T.S. Satyanath developed the theory of a scripto-centric, body-centric and phono-centric study of texts in
the medieval period.
students from different parts of India- allow multiple points- diverse intercultural relations.

9. Centres of Comparative Literature Studies
Centres and Departments in the South of India- Trivandrum, Madurai Kamaraj University, Bharathidasan University,
Kottayam and Pondicherry.
the School of Tamil Studies in Madurai Kamaraj University, a full fledged Comparative Literary Studies Department.
K. Ayappa Paniker,
In Tamil, apart from studies related to the comparison of texts from two different cultures, Classical Tamil
texts were compared with texts from the Greek, Latin and Japanese counterpart traditions.
Punjabi University, Patiala, Dibrugarh University, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Sambalpur
University, Jawaharlal Nehru University and SNDT Women’s University, Mumbai.
1986: new full-fledged department of Comparative Literature- Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat; On
Indian Literatures in Western India
1999: a Department of Dravidian Comparative Literature and Philosophy was established in Dravidian University,
Kuppam.
1992: Indian Comparative Literature Association in Jadavpur and in Delhi Comparative Indian Literature Association
merged and formed Comparative Literature Association of India.

10. Reconfiguration of areas of comparison
In the last years of the seventies (70s),
Indian literatures + Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude
with a few other texts from Latin American Literatures and Literatures from African countries.
● Questions of solidarity (unity) and
● a desire to understand resistance to oppression
● along with larger questions of epistemological (relating to theory of knowledge) shifts and strategies
● to bridge gaps in history resulting from colonial interventions
were often the structuring components of these areas in the syllabus.

11. In the nineties (90s) , AREA STUDIES papers on African, Latin American, Canadian literatures and
literature of Bangladesh were introduced and Pakistan too.
but gradually a field of studies focusing on oral traditions emerged within the space of comparison.
led to a division of the scarce resources; also diverted attention from some of the key challenges in
comparative literature studies in India,
the systematic amalgamation of data related to the Indian context and its analysis from
comparative perspectives, and also perhaps
the mapping of intercultural relations with and among India’s neighbouring countries.
Components from the diverse Area Studies could possibly have been included as integrated parts of the
main curriculum.

12. RECEPTION STUDIES
Right from the beginning of the discipline in India, cross-cultural relations between Indian literatures and
European and American literatures had been in focus.
Question on the term ‘influence’ and shift to ‘reception’ in books.
E.g- Bibliography of Reception of World Literature in Bengali Periodicals (1890 – 1990).
The receiver and not the emitter was in focus.
This also implied that the receiver was taking elements from another culture in accordance with her own
needs or the needs of the system, the foreign elements underwent a transformation in accordance with
forms, elements and ideologies in operation in the system at any given moment.
Reception studies also pointed to historical realities determining conditions of acceptability and hence to
complex configurations between literature and history.
To give an instance, it seemed that romanticism of a particular kind had an easy access into the realm of
Bengali literature, but it was a romanticism that did not accept many of the European elements.

13. Burns and Wordsworth were very popular and it was felt that their romanticism was marked by an inner
strength and serenity. The love for serenity and ‘health’ went back to the classical period and seemed
an important value in the tradition.
Again while Shelley and Byron were often critiqued, the former for having introduced softness and
sentimentality to Bengali poetry, they were also often praised for upholding human rights and liberty in
contrast to the imperialist poetry of Kipling.
Contemporary political needs then were linked with literary values and this explained the contradictory
tensions often found in the reception of romanticism in Bengal.
Shelley, the poet of revolt, began to have a very positive reception when the independence movement
gathered momentum.
In another context, a particular question that gained prominence was whether Shakespeare was imposed
on Indian literature, and comparatists showed, as did Sisir Kumar Das, that there were different
Shakespeare's.
the playwright had a rich and varied reception in the world of theatre.

14. From reception studies the focus gradually turned to cross-cultural reception where reciprocity and
exchange among cultures were studied.
For example, one tried to study the Romantic Movement from a larger perspective, to unravel its many
layers as it travelled between countries, particularly between Europe and India.
The translation of several texts from Sanskrit into German played a role in the emergence of the
Romantic movement
and then in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries Romanticism came back to India, though
in different shades.

15. Amiya Dev - Master’s syllabus- had genres, themes and literary historiography as its core area …
Reception studies both along vertical and horizontal lines formed the next major area of focus
one studied for instance, elements of ancient and medieval literature in modern texts and also inter and intra
literary relations foregrounding impact and responses.
While one studied Vedic, Upanishadic, Buddhist and Jain elements in modern texts,
one also looked at clusters of sermons by Buddha, Mahavira and Nanak, at qissas and katha ballads across the
country,
The early novels in different Indian literatures, and then the impact of Eastern literature and thought on
Western literature and vice versa.

16. Two groups of papers were offered,
one with components from Indian literature at the centre and
the other with Western literature.
students wanted to engage with both in order to have nuanced understandings of the interplay between
local, national and transnational forces.
Introduction of the semester system the division was abandoned and certain other courses of a more general
nature such as Cross-cultural Literary Transactions,
where Rudyard Kipling’s Kim and Rabindranath Tagore’s Gora, were taken up,
or sometimes in courses entitled Literary Transactions one looked more precisely at the tradition of Reason
and Rationalism in European and Indian literatures of the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries.

17. Research Direction
The late nineties and the early twenties were a period of great expansion for Comparative Literature research in
different parts of the country with the University Grants Commission opening its Special Assistance Programme for
research in university departments.
The English department of Calcutta University for instance, received assistance to pursue research on literary relations
between Europe and India in the nineteenth century. Several books and translations emerged out of the project. The
department of English and Comparative Literary Studies at Saurashtra University, Rajkot, took up the theme of Indian
Renaissance and translated several Indian authors into English, studied early travelogues from Western India to
England and in general published collections of theoretical discourse from the nineteenth century.
The Department of Assamese in Dibrugarh University received the grant and published a number of books related to
translations, collections of rare texts and documentation of folk forms. The department of Comparative Literature at
Jadavpur University also received assistance to pursue research in four major areas, East-West Literary Relations,
Indian Literature, Translation Studies and Third World Literature Incidentally, the department had in Manabendra
Bandyopadhyay, an avid translator who translated texts from many so-called "third-world countries".

18. Continue…
In the next phase support was given for publishing textbooks in the area and for preparing an
infrastructure for the study of Indian literatures. This led to the publication of three texts on
genres, themes and literary historiography in the Indian context.
Projects related to annotated bibliographies of periodization in histories of literature also
resulted in two texts. The different ways of conceiving of periods -opened up perspectives
on how some of the popular concepts could be revisited. The notion of derived categories
for instance, was quite often charged with a host of other significations, as for example, in
the case of Romanticism as a term for periodization.
Romanticism had very different dimensions in the Indian context. and necessitated a
different reading within a continuum that situated it often at the source of modernity.

19. Hemanta Kumar Sarma, for instance in his history of Assamese literature divided the
modern age into the pre Romantic and post Romantic or contemporary that he called
Post Swaraj. Post Romantic simultaneously termed Post Swaraj erased simple equations
between terms used in European and Indian literatures.
Under the special assistance programme the department also conducted Eight inter
literary translation workshops. Translating texts from one Indian language to another
without mediation of English.
Preparatory work was held for a few weeks before some of the workshops focusing on
arriving at a reading skill in the target language when the language was from a
neighbouring region as in the case of Assamese and Oriya in the context of Bengali, or
Punjabi in the context of Hindi and so forth and the workshops were quite a success
with several publications.

20. The department at Jadavpur University was upgraded under the programme to the status
of Centre of Advanced Studies in 2005, and research in Comparative Literature took a
completely new turn. The need to foreground the relevance of studying literature was
becoming more and more urgent in the face of a society that was all in favour of
technology and the sciences and with decision makers in the realm of funding for higher
education turning away from the humanities in general.
The task for departments of humanities on literature was to demonstrate that they were
looking into and working with a knowledge system just as any other discipline, only
literature's ways of knowing were different. Literature as knowledge system, therefore,
became a thrust area for again it was felt that comparative literature with its
interdisciplinary formation would be the right place to demonstrate the same.

21. A series of workshops were conducted with scholars from philosophy, history, science and the social
sciences to look into areas of creativity and knowledge, to gain greater understanding of ways of knowing.
From a very different perspective it was felt that stories, poems, songs and performances from oral traditions
that were found in most parts of the country had their g knowledge systems that could provide valuable and
sustainable alternatives to contemporary urban modes of life and living and in several cases also reveal
certain cultural dynamics and value systems that were constantly replenishing mainstream expressive
traditions.
A large focus therefore, in this area was on oral texts and research on methods of engaging with such texts.
The project led to documentation and compilation of notes related to experiences of such studies and the
collaboration with grassroots artists from rural areas. It must be mentioned at this point that in the late
nineties and in the early following decade there was a constant demand for engaging with literatures of
marginalized communities in different platform of comparative literature studies in India, often from such
communities.

22. The national association held two major conferences on the subject during the period A
particular project in this area taken up by the department of Comparative Literature at
Jadavpur was called Vanishing Seeds of Culture based on a study in Bankura district of West
Bengal.
It must be mentioned that Dalit Literature was also taken up in courses in some parts of the
country, but a lot remains to be done in the area as far as pedagogical practices are concerned.
A particularly important question for Comparative Literature in this area could be linked with
questions of Dalit literature's relationship with stream writing, subverting, questioning and at
the same time also inflecting other discourses while continuing to maintain its unique identity
based to a large degree on performativity to draw the reader in as, an ethical witness to the
extreme limits of human suffering on which it is poised.

23. The second area Centre for Advanced Studies was the interface between literatures of
India and neighbouring countries.
The first preliminary research in this area led to links that suggested continuity and a
constant series of interactions between and among Asian cultures and communities since
ancient times.
Among the projects planned under the inter-Asian series was one en travelogue from
Bengal to Asian countries and here an annotated bibliography that could provide an initial
foundation for the study of inter literary relations was published.
A second project involved working on the image of Burma in Bengali and Oriya literature
in late nineteenth and early twentieth century Travel narratives and diaries, newspaper
articles from old periodicals, excerpts from literature and pictorial images of Burmese
people in the Indian press were compiled.

24. 21st century engaged with two other related fields of study,
1) Translation Studies 2). Cultural Studies
Almost all departments or centres of Comparative Literature today have courses on Translation
or Translation Studies. Both are seen as integral to the study of Comparative Literature.
Translation Studies cover different areas of inter literary studies Histories of translation may be
used to map literary relations while analysis of acts of translation leads to the understanding of
important characteristics of both the source and the target literary and cultural systems. Other
dimensions of literary studies are opened up when one sees translation as rewriting.
The department of Comparative Literature at Jadavpur University today has a Centre for the
Translation of Indian Literatures.
Interface with Translation Studies and Cultural Studies

25. The M Phil course on the subject at Jadavpur University highlights changing marginalities,
subcultures and movements in relation to contemporary matinals and globalization, and
also sexualities, gender and the politics of identity Cultural Studies may also be a key
component in different kinds of interdisciplinary courses within the discipline.
For instance, a course in Delhi University takes up the theme of city and village in Indian
literature and goes into representations of human habitat systems and ecology in literature,
looks for concepts and terms for such settlements, poes into archaeological evidences and
the accounts of travellers from Greece, China and Portugal to demonstrate the differences
that exist at levels of perception and ideological positions.
Continue…

26. It is evident that Comparative Literature in the country today has multifaceted goals and visions in
accordance with historical needs, both local and planetary. As in the case of humanities and literary
studies, the discipline too is engaged with issues that would lead to the enhancement of civilizational
gestures, against forces that are divisive and that, constantly reduce the potentials of human beings.
In doing so it is engaged in discovering new links and lines of non-hierarchical connectivity, of what
Kumkum Sangari in a recent article called "co-construction". a process anchored in "subtle and
complex histories of translation, circulation and extraction" And comparatists work with the
knowledge that a lot remains to be done and that the task of the construction of literary histories, in
terms of literary relations among neighbouring regions, and of larger wholes one of the primary tasks
of Comparative Literature today has perhaps yet to begin. In all its endeavours, however, the primary
aim of some of the early architects of the discipline to nurture and foster creativity continues as a
subterranean force.
Non-hierarchical connectivity

27. Thank you